With you every step of the way!
Our Story
Eaton Smith emerged from the merger of two prominent Huddersfield law firms in 1997. Since then, we have established ourselves as a leading legal practice in the region, offering a comprehensive range of services to individuals and businesses. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers and legal advisors have helped over 6,000 clients throughout Yorkshire, the UK, and internationally.
What We Do
We provide a full spectrum of legal services across various practice areas, including:
For Businesses
- Corporate & Commercial: Strategic planning, mergers & acquisitions, commercial contracts, litigation support.
- Commercial Property: Acquisitions & sales, property finance, landlord & tenant matters.
- Employment: Employment contracts, disputes, redundancy, discrimination.
- Dispute Resolution: Litigation, mediation, negotiation, alternative dispute resolution.
For Individuals
- Family & Relationships: Divorce & separation, child custody, financial arrangements.
- Child Care Law: Adoption, child arrangements, care proceedings.
- Conveyancing: Buying or selling a property.
- Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence: Compensation for injuries caused by negligence.
- Probate & Estate Planning: Writing wills, trusts, power of attorney.
Why Choose Eaton Smith?
- Experienced & Skilled Team: Our lawyers have extensive experience and specialist knowledge in their respective fields.
- Personable & Client-Focused: We believe in building strong relationships with our clients and providing personalized attention.
- Supportive & Collaborative: We work alongside clients to understand their needs and achieve their goals.
- Competitive Fees: We offer transparent and competitive fees with flexible payment options.
Our Values
Integrity, excellence, empathy, accessibility, and innovation are the core values that guide our operations. We are committed to providing:
- Accessibility: Easy-to-understand legal advice and clear communication.
- Innovation: Staying updated with the latest legal advancements.
- Value: Delivering cost-effective and practical solutions.
Join Us
Eaton Smith is looking for talented and dedicated individuals to join our team. If you are passionate about providing exceptional legal services and making a difference in the lives of our clients, we encourage you to explore our careers page for current opportunities.
Poor Experience
Eaton Smith Solicitors have received numerous negative reviews from clients who have had poor experiences with their services. The solicitors, including Zahra, Neil, and Julie Bales, have been accused of being unprofessional, providing no useful advice, and failing to communicate with clients. Several reviewers have mentioned delays in responding to inquiries, vague responses, and a lack of support throughout the process.
Mixed Experience
Nigel and Matthew Guille have had positive experiences with Eatons Smith Solicitors. Nigel praised Ian Holdsworth and Anne Wilson for their help with the purchase of a new woodland, citing their professionalism, transparency, and lack of hidden fees. Matthew had a similarly positive experience with Irina, who helped him with an employment matter and was knowledgeable and efficient.
Unsatisfactory Service
Joseph Green and Iain Jardine have had poor experiences with Eaton Smith Solicitors. Joseph was unhappy with the solicitors' handling of court orders, citing lack of response, delays, and lying in court. Iain was dissatisfied with the solicitors' conveyancing services, citing delays, poor communication, and incorrect assumptions.
Complicated Experience
Paula Green had a mixed experience with Eaton Smith Solicitors. Although she didn't get the outcome she wanted, she praised Jane and Adeeba for their efforts and support. However, she deducted a star due to a mix-up when Jane left and her case was forgotten, ultimately leading to Adeeba taking over.
Regrettable Experience
Sharon Goodall has had a regrettable experience with Eaton Smith Solicitors. She used the firm nine years ago and had a positive experience, but her recent experience with two solicitors has been poor, citing failure to act on her instructions, providing information benefiting the opposition, and exorbitant costs.